↓ Skip to main content

Children’s Doctor Games and Nudity at Danish Childcare Institutions

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Sexual Behavior, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
Title
Children’s Doctor Games and Nudity at Danish Childcare Institutions
Published in
Archives of Sexual Behavior, February 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10508-017-1144-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Else-Marie Buch Leander, Per Lindsø Larsen, Karen Pallesgaard Munk

Abstract

This article presents the first Danish study of the acceptance of children's nudity and sexuality at Danish childcare institutions. The study revealed an important cultural shift in the attitude toward children's nudity and sexual games, the so-called doctor games. Although these were quite accepted at Danish childcare institutions until the beginning of this century, the study showed that new, pervasive regulations had been established to control the child's body and its sexuality. A new discourse revealed that fear of child sexual abuse, in particular, had influenced views of children's sexual games and nudity and that, at times, the child itself was viewed as a potential threat to other children. This marks a new development in Denmark, internationally known for its broadmindedness, and this article discusses the background to this cultural shift in the institutions, and possible implications for the children.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 44 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 16%
Researcher 6 14%
Student > Master 5 11%
Student > Postgraduate 3 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 5%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 16 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 7 16%
Social Sciences 4 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 7%
Unspecified 2 5%
Other 8 18%
Unknown 16 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2022.
All research outputs
#2,590,856
of 23,954,951 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#1,139
of 3,564 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,201
of 480,974 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#22
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,954,951 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,564 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 480,974 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.