↓ Skip to main content

Cultural Considerations for Psychologists in Primary Care

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
Title
Cultural Considerations for Psychologists in Primary Care
Published in
Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings, February 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10880-018-9546-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adeya Richmond, Jessica Jackson

Abstract

Many health concerns in the United States (e.g., diabetes) are routinely managed in primary care settings. Regardless of the medical condition, patients' health is directly influenced by factors such as healthcare providers and cultural background. Training related to how behaviors influence health, coupled with training on how cultural diversity intersects with mental health, allows psychologists to have the relevant expertise to assist in the development of primary care behavioral health interventions. However, many psychologists in primary care struggle with how to integrate a culture-centered paradigm into their roles as behavioral health providers. This paper provides an introduction on how three culture-centered concepts (providers' cultural sensitivity, patient-provider cultural congruency, and patients' health literacy) can be applied in primary care using the Five A's Organizational Construct and a model of cultural competence. In addition, the paper includes a section on integration of cultural considerations into consultation and training and concludes with a discussion of how the three culture-centered concepts have implications for health equity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 61 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 8 13%
Student > Master 6 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Lecturer 5 8%
Other 5 8%
Other 14 23%
Unknown 17 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 11 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 11%
Social Sciences 6 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 5%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 20 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2018.
All research outputs
#3,576,148
of 23,023,224 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings
#59
of 444 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,848
of 474,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings
#3
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,023,224 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 444 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 474,288 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.