↓ Skip to main content

Coagulase-negative staphylococci: update on the molecular epidemiology and clinical presentation, with a focus on Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus saprophyticus

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
130 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
175 Mendeley
Title
Coagulase-negative staphylococci: update on the molecular epidemiology and clinical presentation, with a focus on Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus saprophyticus
Published in
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, May 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10096-011-1270-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. Widerström, J. Wiström, A. Sjöstedt, T. Monsen

Abstract

Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS), originally described as ubiquitous commensals of the healthy human skin and mucosa, have emerged as important opportunistic pathogens primarily causing healthcare-associated infections in patients with indwelling medical devices. Recent studies, utilizing new molecular typing methods, particularly on Staphylococcus epidermidis, have increased our understanding of the mechanisms that contribute to the evolutionary success of these extremely versatile microorganisms. In the following mini-review, we summarize recent research in this area focusing on the molecular methods and epidemiology of S. epidermidis and S. saprophyticus.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 175 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Sri Lanka 1 <1%
Unknown 171 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 31 18%
Student > Master 24 14%
Researcher 23 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 13%
Student > Postgraduate 13 7%
Other 27 15%
Unknown 35 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 36 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 36 21%
Immunology and Microbiology 21 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 3%
Other 20 11%
Unknown 39 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2021.
All research outputs
#7,209,033
of 22,786,087 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
#721
of 2,769 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,240
of 110,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
#8
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,087 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,769 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,044 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.