↓ Skip to main content

Numerical evaluation of the dilogarithm of complex argument

Overview of attention for article published in Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, May 1995
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Numerical evaluation of the dilogarithm of complex argument
Published in
Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, May 1995
DOI 10.1007/bf00692071
Authors

Carlos Osácar, Jesús Palacián, Manuel Palacios

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 50%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 13%
Unknown 1 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 5 63%
Computer Science 1 13%
Materials Science 1 13%
Unknown 1 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2023.
All research outputs
#7,916,538
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy
#178
of 504 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,786
of 25,395 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 504 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 25,395 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them