↓ Skip to main content

Large-scale land acquisitions aggravate the feminization of poverty: findings from a case study in Mozambique

Overview of attention for article published in GeoJournal, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
Title
Large-scale land acquisitions aggravate the feminization of poverty: findings from a case study in Mozambique
Published in
GeoJournal, February 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10708-017-9836-1
Authors

Juliana Porsani, Martina Angela Caretta, Kari Lehtilä

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 59 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Lecturer 2 3%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 18 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 13 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 10%
Environmental Science 5 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 8%
Psychology 3 5%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 19 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2018.
All research outputs
#15,492,327
of 23,023,224 outputs
Outputs from GeoJournal
#555
of 739 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#274,112
of 446,257 outputs
Outputs of similar age from GeoJournal
#9
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,023,224 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 739 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,257 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.