↓ Skip to main content

In vivo growth-inhibition of Sarcoma 180 by an α-(1 → 4)-glucan–β-(1 → 6)-glucan-protein complex polysaccharide obtained from Agaricus blazei Murill

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Natural Medicines, August 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
Title
In vivo growth-inhibition of Sarcoma 180 by an α-(1 → 4)-glucan–β-(1 → 6)-glucan-protein complex polysaccharide obtained from Agaricus blazei Murill
Published in
Journal of Natural Medicines, August 2008
DOI 10.1007/s11418-008-0286-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria Leônia Costa Gonzaga, Daniel Pereira Bezerra, Ana Paula Negreiros Nunes Alves, Nylane Maria Nunes de Alencar, Rodney de Oliveira Mesquita, Michael Will Lima, Sandra de Aguiar Soares, Cláudia Pessoa, Manoel Odorico de Moraes, Letícia Veras Costa-Lotufo

Abstract

Agaricus blazei Murrill, a native mushroom of Brazil, has been widely consumed in different parts of the world due to its anticancer potential. This effect is generally attributed to its polysaccharides; however, the precise structure of these has not been fully characterized. To better understand the relationship between polysaccharide structures and antitumor activity, we investigated the effect of the intraperitoneally (i.p.) or orally (p.o.) administered alpha-(1-->4)-glucan-beta-(1-->6)-glucan-protein complex polysaccharide from A. blazei alone or in association with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in tumor growth using Sarcoma 180 transplanted mice. Hematological, biochemical, and histopathological analyses were performed in order to evaluate the toxicological aspects of the polysaccharide treatment. The polysaccharide had no direct cytotoxic action on tumor cells in vitro. However, the polysaccharide showed strong in vivo antitumor effect. Thus, the tumor growth-inhibitory effect of the polysaccharide is apparently due to host-mediated mechanisms. The histopathological analysis suggests that the liver and the kidney were not affected by polysaccharide treatment. Neither enzymatic activity of transaminases (AST and ALT) nor urea levels were significantly altered. In hematological analysis, leucopeny was observed after 5-FU treatment, but this effect was prevented when the treatment was associated with the polysaccharide. In conclusion, this polysaccharide probably could explain the ethnopharmacological use of this mushroom in the treatment of cancer.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 3%
Unknown 37 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 16%
Student > Master 6 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Student > Postgraduate 3 8%
Other 9 24%
Unknown 6 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 34%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 18%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Chemistry 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 8 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2012.
All research outputs
#7,453,350
of 22,786,087 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Natural Medicines
#88
of 530 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,994
of 83,255 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Natural Medicines
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,087 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 530 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 83,255 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them