| Title |
Microdialysis Calibration Using Retrodialysis and Zero-Net Flux: Application to a Study of the Distribution of Zidovudine to Rabbit Cerebrospinal Fluid and Thalamus
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Pharmaceutical Research, October 1993
|
| DOI | 10.1023/a:1018906821725 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yanfeng Wang, Shekman L. Wong, Ronald J. Sawchuk |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 35% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 17% |
| Professor | 3 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 9% |
| Other | 3 | 13% |
| Unknown | 1 | 4% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 26% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 22% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 17% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 9% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 13% |
| Unknown | 2 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2010.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Pharmaceutical Research
#1,134
of 2,983 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,756
of 19,370 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pharmaceutical Research
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,983 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 19,370 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.