Title |
The first discovery of a brachiosaurid from the Asian continent
|
---|---|
Published in |
The Science of Nature, February 2001
|
DOI | 10.1007/s001140000201 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
J.-D. Lim, L.D. Martin, K.-S. Baek |
Abstract |
Described here is a sauropod tooth from the Early Cretaceous of South Korea, similar to Brachiosaurus. The crown of the tooth is beveled off lingually so that when worn it presents a chisel-like edge. This find confirms the presence of a brachiosaurid in East Asia during the Early Cretaceous. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 2% |
Portugal | 1 | 2% |
Germany | 1 | 2% |
Argentina | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 60 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 25% |
Researcher | 16 | 25% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 11% |
Student > Master | 4 | 6% |
Other | 8 | 13% |
Unknown | 6 | 9% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 40 | 63% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 27% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 5 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,608,409
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from The Science of Nature
#222
of 2,263 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,123
of 113,958 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Science of Nature
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,263 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 113,958 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them