↓ Skip to main content

DNA metabarcoding of spiders, insects, and springtails for exploring potential linkage between above- and below-ground food webs

Overview of attention for article published in Zoological Letters, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#24 of 185)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
22 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
151 Mendeley
Title
DNA metabarcoding of spiders, insects, and springtails for exploring potential linkage between above- and below-ground food webs
Published in
Zoological Letters, February 2018
DOI 10.1186/s40851-018-0088-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hirokazu Toju, Yuki G. Baba

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 151 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 17%
Researcher 23 15%
Student > Master 18 12%
Student > Bachelor 16 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 5%
Other 25 17%
Unknown 36 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 67 44%
Environmental Science 17 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 9%
Unspecified 3 2%
Engineering 2 1%
Other 2 1%
Unknown 46 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2019.
All research outputs
#1,538,993
of 25,711,998 outputs
Outputs from Zoological Letters
#24
of 185 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,056
of 472,680 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Zoological Letters
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,998 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 185 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 472,680 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them