↓ Skip to main content

Central neurogenic hyperventilation treated with intravenous fentanyl followed by transdermal application

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Anesthesia, August 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
Central neurogenic hyperventilation treated with intravenous fentanyl followed by transdermal application
Published in
Journal of Anesthesia, August 2007
DOI 10.1007/s00540-007-0526-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yushi U. Adachi, Hideki Sano, Matsuyuki Doi, Shigehito Sato

Abstract

Central neurogenic hyperventilation (CNH) is a rare clinical condition that is sometimes difficult to treat. We report a 51-year-old female patient who was successfully treated with intravenous fentanyl followed by transdermal fentanyl. She had a transient epileptic episode with a temporary loss of consciousness. Immediately before her admission to the intensive care unit (ICU), her Pa(CO2) and pH were 6.7 mmHg and 7.64, respectively. Rebreathing from a paper bag and the intravenous administration of diazepam failed to improve the decreased Pa(CO2). Therefore, we administered intravenous fentanyl, at the rate of 50 microg x h(-1). Two days after her admission to the ICU, the Pa(CO2) had increased gradually to 22.9 mmHg, and the pH to 7.50. Although infiltration of recurrent lymphoma to the brain became apparent, she remained active, without epilepsy or loss of consciousness, in a general ward for 1 month with transdermal fentanyl, treatment until she again became drowsy; she died on hospital day 58. Transdermal fentanyl seems to be a good palliative measure to treat CNH in patients who have advanced neoplasms.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 32%
Student > Bachelor 4 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 16%
Student > Postgraduate 2 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 2 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 74%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Chemistry 1 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Unknown 2 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2023.
All research outputs
#7,722,978
of 23,485,204 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Anesthesia
#175
of 838 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,776
of 67,987 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Anesthesia
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,485,204 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 838 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,987 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them