↓ Skip to main content

Prevalence of DSM-5 Autism Spectrum Disorder Among School-Based Children Aged 3–12 Years in Shanghai, China

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
15 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
Title
Prevalence of DSM-5 Autism Spectrum Disorder Among School-Based Children Aged 3–12 Years in Shanghai, China
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, February 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10803-018-3507-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zhijuan Jin, You Yang, Shijian Liu, Hong Huang, Xingming Jin

Abstract

We estimated the prevalence of ASD in a population-based sample comprising children aged 3-12 years (N = 74,252) in Shanghai. This included a high-risk group sampled from special education schools and a low-risk group randomly sampled from general schools. First, we asked parents and then teachers to complete the Social Communication Questionnaire for participating children. Children who screened positive based on both parental and teachers' reports were comprehensively assessed. ASD was identified based on DSM-5 criteria. We identified 711 children as being at-risk for ASD, of which 203 were identified as ASD cases. The prevalence of ASD was 8.3 per 10,000, which is likely an underestimate, given that 81.6% of the children diagnosed with ASD had IQs below 40. This is the first report on the prevalence of ASD according to DSM-5 in China.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 87 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 14%
Researcher 8 9%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Student > Postgraduate 6 7%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 26 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 21 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 16%
Social Sciences 7 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 29 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2018.
All research outputs
#1,947,725
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#853
of 5,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,013
of 340,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#20
of 108 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,038 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 108 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.