↓ Skip to main content

The Relationship Between Sluggish Cognitive Tempo, Subtypes of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder, and Anxiety Disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
113 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
114 Mendeley
Title
The Relationship Between Sluggish Cognitive Tempo, Subtypes of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder, and Anxiety Disorders
Published in
Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology, February 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10802-011-9488-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Benedicte Skirbekk, Berit Hjelde Hansen, Beate Oerbeck, Hanne Kristensen

Abstract

The objective of the present study was to examine the relationship between sluggish cognitive tempo (SCT), subtypes of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and anxiety disorders (AnxDs). One hundred and forty-one children (90 males, 51 females) aged 7-13 years were assigned to four groups, i.e., referred children with comorbid AnxDs and ADHD (n = 25), ADHD (n = 39), AnxDs (n = 41), and nonreferred controls (n = 36). Furthermore we explored the association between SCT and several neurocognitive measures (reaction time, verbal memory, and spatial memory). Diagnoses were established using Kiddie-SADS P/L. SCT was assessed using a 17-item mother-reported questionnaire. SCT correlated significantly with inattentiveness, regardless of the subtype of ADHD. Furthermore, we found significant differences in the levels of SCT among the four groups, with the highest SCT scores observed in the comorbid group. SCT correlated with variability in spatial memory; in contrast, there was no correlation between SCT and reaction time.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 109 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 16%
Student > Master 16 14%
Researcher 11 10%
Student > Bachelor 9 8%
Other 15 13%
Unknown 23 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 59 52%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Neuroscience 5 4%
Social Sciences 5 4%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 22 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2020.
All research outputs
#7,629,858
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology
#794
of 2,091 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,853
of 124,143 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology
#3
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,091 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 124,143 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.