↓ Skip to main content

Theory of the libration of the moon

Overview of attention for article published in Earth, Moon, and Planets, August 1981
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
10 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
97 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
Theory of the libration of the moon
Published in
Earth, Moon, and Planets, August 1981
DOI 10.1007/bf00911807
Authors

Donald H. Eckhardt

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 9%
Unknown 10 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 27%
Other 2 18%
Student > Master 2 18%
Student > Bachelor 1 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 4 36%
Arts and Humanities 1 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 9%
Engineering 1 9%
Unknown 4 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2022.
All research outputs
#8,571,053
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Earth, Moon, and Planets
#82
of 324 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,858
of 6,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Earth, Moon, and Planets
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 324 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 6,830 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them