↓ Skip to main content

A Combinatorial Approach to Detecting Gene-Gene and Gene-Environment Interactions in Family Studies

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Human Genetics, October 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
81 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Combinatorial Approach to Detecting Gene-Gene and Gene-Environment Interactions in Family Studies
Published in
American Journal of Human Genetics, October 2008
DOI 10.1016/j.ajhg.2008.09.001
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiang-Yang Lou, Guo-Bo Chen, Lei Yan, Jennie Z., Jamie E. Mangold, Jun Zhu, Robert C. Elston, Ming D. Li

Abstract

Widespread multifactor interactions present a significant challenge in determining risk factors of complex diseases. Several combinatorial approaches, such as the multifactor dimensionality reduction (MDR) method, have emerged as a promising tool for better detecting gene-gene (G x G) and gene-environment (G x E) interactions. We recently developed a general combinatorial approach, namely the generalized multifactor dimensionality reduction (GMDR) method, which can entertain both qualitative and quantitative phenotypes and allows for both discrete and continuous covariates to detect G x G and G x E interactions in a sample of unrelated individuals. In this article, we report the development of an algorithm that can be used to study G x G and G x E interactions for family-based designs, called pedigree-based GMDR (PGMDR). Compared to the available method, our proposed method has several major improvements, including allowing for covariate adjustments and being applicable to arbitrary phenotypes, arbitrary pedigree structures, and arbitrary patterns of missing marker genotypes. Our Monte Carlo simulations provide evidence that the PGMDR method is superior in performance to identify epistatic loci compared to the MDR-pedigree disequilibrium test (PDT). Finally, we applied our proposed approach to a genetic data set on tobacco dependence and found a significant interaction between two taste receptor genes (i.e., TAS2R16 and TAS2R38) in affecting nicotine dependence.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Norway 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 64 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 37%
Researcher 13 19%
Professor > Associate Professor 10 14%
Professor 4 6%
Student > Master 3 4%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 8 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 47%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 10%
Mathematics 4 6%
Computer Science 3 4%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 10 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2017.
All research outputs
#4,312,333
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Human Genetics
#2,084
of 5,879 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,212
of 101,409 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Human Genetics
#13
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,879 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 101,409 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.