↓ Skip to main content

On Compatibility Conditions for the Left Cauchy–Green Deformation Field in Three Dimensions

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Elasticity, August 1999
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#15 of 127)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
On Compatibility Conditions for the Left Cauchy–Green Deformation Field in Three Dimensions
Published in
Journal of Elasticity, August 1999
DOI 10.1023/a:1007653400249
Authors

Amit Acharya

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 4%
Unknown 23 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 21%
Professor 4 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Student > Master 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 5 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 11 46%
Materials Science 3 13%
Computer Science 2 8%
Physics and Astronomy 2 8%
Unknown 6 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2024.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Elasticity
#15
of 127 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,275
of 34,663 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Elasticity
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 127 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 34,663 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them