| Title |
Can only reversed vegetative symptoms define atypical depression?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, December 2002
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00406-002-0395-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Franco Benazzi |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 55 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 14 | 25% |
| Unknown | 11 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 15 | 26% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 26% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 15 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2009.
All research outputs
#7,856,604
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience
#462
of 1,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,485
of 132,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,243 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 132,209 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.