| Title |
The cue-dependent nature of state-dependent retrieval
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Memory & Cognition, March 1980
|
| DOI | 10.3758/bf03213419 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
James Eric Eich |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 111 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 13% |
| Researcher | 11 | 9% |
| Professor | 10 | 9% |
| Other | 20 | 17% |
| Unknown | 15 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 64 | 55% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 8 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 9% |
| Unknown | 19 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2019.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Memory & Cognition
#562
of 1,689 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,700
of 6,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Memory & Cognition
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,689 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 6,262 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them