| Title |
A new genus of triconodont mammals from the Early Cretaceous of Western Siberia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Doklady Botanical Sciences, August 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1134/s0012496610040137 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
A. V. Lopatin, E. N. Maschenko, A. O. Averianov |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 17% |
| Researcher | 4 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 9% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Unknown | 6 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 9 | 39% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 30% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 6 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2022.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Doklady Botanical Sciences
#73
of 308 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,155
of 104,227 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Doklady Botanical Sciences
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 308 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,227 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them