↓ Skip to main content

Molecular basis of neurological dysfunction coupled with haemolytic anaemia in human glucose-6-phosphate isomerase (GPI) deficiency

Overview of attention for article published in Human Genetics, November 1998
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
Molecular basis of neurological dysfunction coupled with haemolytic anaemia in human glucose-6-phosphate isomerase (GPI) deficiency
Published in
Human Genetics, November 1998
DOI 10.1007/s004390050849
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wilfried Kugler, Kathrin Breme, Petra Laspe, Hilary Muirhead, Christopher Davies, Heinz Winkler, Werner Schröter, M. Lakomek

Abstract

Glucose-6-phosphate isomerase (GPI) deficiency, an autosomal recessive genetic disorder with the typical manifestation of nonspherocytic haemolytic anaemia, can be associated in some cases with neurological impairment. GPI has been found to be identical to neuroleukin (NLK), which has neurotrophic and lymphokine properties. To focus on the possible effects of GPI mutations on the central nervous system through an effect on neuroleukin activity, we analysed DNA isolated from two patients with severe GPI deficiency, one of them with additional neurological deficits, and their families. The neurologically affected patient (GPI Homburg) is compound heterozygous for a 59 A-->C (H20P) and a 1016 T-->C (L339P) exchange. Owing to the insertion of proline, the H20P and L339P mutations are likely to affect the folding and activity of the enzyme. In the second family studied, the two affected siblings showed no neurological symptoms. The identified mutations are 1166 A-->G (H389R) and 1549 C-->G (L517V), which are located at the subunit interface. We propose that mutations that lead to incorrect folding destroy both catalytic (GPI) and neurotrophic (NLK) activities, thereby leading to the observed clinical symptoms (GPI Homburg). Those alterations at the active site, however, that allow correct folding retain the neurotrophic properties of the molecule (GPI Calden).

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 25%
Researcher 3 15%
Student > Bachelor 3 15%
Other 2 10%
Student > Master 2 10%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 3 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 45%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 5%
Unspecified 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2020.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Human Genetics
#1,014
of 2,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,749
of 41,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Genetics
#7
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,957 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 41,240 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.