↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of noninvasive models of fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B

Overview of attention for article published in Hepatology International, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
Title
Comparison of noninvasive models of fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B
Published in
Hepatology International, July 2011
DOI 10.1007/s12072-011-9296-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

S. C. Raftopoulos, J. George, M. Bourliere, E. Rossi, W. B. de Boer, G. P. Jeffrey, M. Bulsara, D. J. Speers, G. MacQuillan, H. L. I. Ching, N. Kontorinis, W. Cheng, J. Flexman, S. Fermoyle, P. Rigby, L. Walsh, D. McLeod, L. A. Adams

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND GOALS: Liver fibrosis influences treatment and surveillance strategies in chronic hepatitis B (CHB). This multicenter study aimed to examine the accuracy of serum fibrosis models in CHB patients including those with low alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels and serially in those undergoing treatment. METHOD: We examined noninvasive fibrosis models [Hepascore, Fibrotest, APRI, hepatitis e antigen (HBeAg)-positive and -negative models] in 179 CHB patients who underwent liver biopsy and fibrosis assessment by METAVIR and image morphometry. Serial Hepascore measurements were assessed in 40 subjects for up to 8.7 years. RESULTS: Hepascore was more accurate than Fibrotest [area under the curve (AUC) 0.83 vs. 0.72, P = 0.05] and HBeAg-positive model (AUC 0.83 vs. 72, P = 0.03) for significant fibrosis but was not significantly different to APRI or HBeAg-negative scores. Fibrosis area assessed by morphometry was correlated with Hepascore (r = 0.603, P < 0.001), Fibrotest (r = 0.392, P = 0.03), and HBeAg-positive (r = 0.492, P = 0.001) scores only. Among 73 patients with an ALT <60 IU/L, noninvasive models were useful to predict fibrosis (PPV 80-90%) or exclude significant fibrosis (NPV 79-100%). Hepascore increased significantly among patients monitored without treatment and reduced among patients undergoing therapy (0.05/year ± 0.03 vs. -0.04/year ± 0.02, P = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Serum fibrosis models are predictive of fibrosis in CHB and assist in identifying subjects with low-normal ALT levels for treatment.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 14%
Researcher 2 14%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Professor 1 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Other 4 29%
Unknown 3 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 7%
Engineering 1 7%
Unknown 7 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2021.
All research outputs
#4,695,994
of 22,786,087 outputs
Outputs from Hepatology International
#69
of 522 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,925
of 116,844 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Hepatology International
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,087 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 522 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 116,844 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them