↓ Skip to main content

Managing hyperemesis gravidarum: a multimodal challenge

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, July 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
71 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
224 Mendeley
Title
Managing hyperemesis gravidarum: a multimodal challenge
Published in
BMC Medicine, July 2010
DOI 10.1186/1741-7015-8-46
Pubmed ID
Authors

JK Jueckstock, R Kaestner, I Mylonas

Abstract

Up to 90% of pregnant women experience nausea and vomiting. When prolonged or severe, this is known as hyperemesis gravidarum (HG), which can, in individual cases, be life threatening. In this article the aetiology, diagnosis and treatment strategies will be presented based on a selective literature review. Treatment strategies range from outpatient dietary advice and antiemetic drugs to hospitalization and intravenous (IV) fluid replacement in persistent or severe cases. Alternative methods, such as acupuncture, are not yet evidence based but sometimes have a therapeutic effect.In most cases, the condition is self limiting and subsides by around 20 weeks gestation. More severe forms require medical intervention once other organic causes of nausea and vomiting have been excluded. In addition, a psychosomatic approach is often helpful.In view of its potential complexity, general practitioners and obstetricians should be well informed about HG and therapy should be multimodal.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 224 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Unknown 219 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 44 20%
Student > Master 30 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 6%
Student > Postgraduate 13 6%
Other 35 16%
Unknown 73 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 84 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 30 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 2%
Psychology 4 2%
Other 17 8%
Unknown 78 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2022.
All research outputs
#2,383,628
of 23,989,841 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#1,553
of 3,644 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,660
of 97,848 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#7
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,989,841 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,644 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,848 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.