You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Improving estimation of flight altitude in wildlife telemetry studies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Applied Ecology, March 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1111/1365-2664.13135 |
| Authors |
Sharon A. Poessel, Adam E. Duerr, Jonathan C. Hall, Melissa A. Braham, Todd E. Katzner |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 2 | 18% |
| United States | 1 | 9% |
| Australia | 1 | 9% |
| South Africa | 1 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 5 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 55% |
| Scientists | 4 | 36% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 72 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 13% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Unknown | 19 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 33 | 46% |
| Environmental Science | 12 | 17% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 1% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 1% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 23 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2018.
All research outputs
#6,639,074
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Ecology
#2,529
of 4,180 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,726
of 351,042 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Ecology
#64
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,180 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.6. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,042 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.