| Title |
Role of oxidative stress in infectious diseases. A review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Folia Microbiologica, March 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12223-013-0239-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Miroslav Pohanka |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 132 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 13% |
| Researcher | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 25 | 19% |
| Unknown | 31 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 33 | 25% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 21 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 7% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 8 | 6% |
| Chemistry | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 21 | 16% |
| Unknown | 34 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2019.
All research outputs
#4,696,096
of 22,786,087 outputs
Outputs from Folia Microbiologica
#44
of 739 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,091
of 216,316 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Folia Microbiologica
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,087 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 739 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 216,316 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them