| Title |
Uranium pollution of South African streams – An overview of the situation in gold mining areas of the Witwatersrand
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
GeoJournal, October 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10708-004-2867-4 |
| Authors |
F. Winde, L. A. Sandham |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 5 | 7% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 61 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 16 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 10% |
| Researcher | 6 | 9% |
| Other | 11 | 16% |
| Unknown | 11 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 13 | 19% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 11 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 7% |
| Engineering | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 17 | 25% |
| Unknown | 11 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2018.
All research outputs
#5,567,202
of 25,795,662 outputs
Outputs from GeoJournal
#148
of 847 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,444
of 76,071 outputs
Outputs of similar age from GeoJournal
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,795,662 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 847 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,071 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.