↓ Skip to main content

Hypothesis: Iodine, selenium and the development of breast cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Causes & Control, February 2000
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
Title
Hypothesis: Iodine, selenium and the development of breast cancer
Published in
Cancer Causes & Control, February 2000
DOI 10.1023/a:1008925301459
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephen A. Cann, Johannes P. van Netten, Christiaan van Netten

Abstract

In this paper we examine some of the evidence linking iodine and selenium to breast cancer development. Seaweed is a popular dietary component in Japan and a rich source of both of these essential elements. We hypothesize that this dietary preference may be associated with the low incidence of benign and malignant breast disease in Japanese women. In animal and human studies, iodine administration has been shown to cause regression of both iodine-deficient goiter and benign pathological breast tissue. Iodine, in addition to its incorporation into thyroid hormones, is organified into anti-proliferative iodolipids in the thyroid; such compounds may also play a role in the proliferative control of extrathyroidal tissues. Selenium acts synergistically with iodine. All three mono-deiodinase enzymes are selenium-dependent and are involved in thyroid hormone regulation. In this way selenium status may affect both thyroid hormone homeostasis and iodine availability.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 1%
Unknown 70 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 13%
Student > Bachelor 9 13%
Student > Postgraduate 7 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Other 14 20%
Unknown 14 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Computer Science 2 3%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 15 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2022.
All research outputs
#4,759,600
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Causes & Control
#525
of 2,266 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,066
of 111,361 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Causes & Control
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,266 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,361 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.