| Title |
Unintended Consequences of Evidence-Based Treatment Policy Reform: Is Implementation the Goal or the Strategy for Higher Quality Care?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, February 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10488-018-0853-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alayna L. Park, Katherine H. Tsai, Karen Guan, Bruce F. Chorpita |
| Abstract |
This study examined patterns of evidence-based treatment (EBT) delivery following a county-wide EBT reform initiative. Data were gathered from 60 youth and their 21 providers, who were instructed to deliver therapy as they normally would under the EBT initiative. Results showed limited applicability of county-supported EBTs to this service sample, and that most youth did not receive traditional delivery of EBTs. Findings suggest that it may be unrealistic to expect providers to deliver EBTs with fidelity with all clients, and that EBT implementation may be best thought of as a strategy for improving mental health services rather than a goal. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 12 | 33% |
| Australia | 5 | 14% |
| Cameroon | 2 | 6% |
| Ireland | 1 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 3% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 13 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 21 | 58% |
| Members of the public | 10 | 28% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 58 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 11 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 17% |
| Researcher | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 14% |
| Unknown | 16 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 16 | 28% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 21 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2018.
All research outputs
#1,593,029
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
#54
of 723 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,858
of 457,663 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
#4
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 723 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 457,663 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.