↓ Skip to main content

Hydroxyl tagging velocimetry (HTV) in experimental air flows

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Physics B, February 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
Hydroxyl tagging velocimetry (HTV) in experimental air flows
Published in
Applied Physics B, February 2002
DOI 10.1007/s003400100777
Authors

L.A. Ribarov, J.A. Wehrmeyer, R.W. Pitz, R.A. Yetter

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 5%
Netherlands 1 5%
United States 1 5%
Canada 1 5%
Unknown 18 82%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 36%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 32%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Professor 1 5%
Student > Master 1 5%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 1 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 17 77%
Physics and Astronomy 3 14%
Unknown 2 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2010.
All research outputs
#8,064,660
of 24,214,995 outputs
Outputs from Applied Physics B
#408
of 1,582 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,569
of 128,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Physics B
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,214,995 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,582 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 128,072 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.