↓ Skip to main content

The Metabolic Disturbances of Motoneurons Exposed to Glutamate

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Neurobiology, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
The Metabolic Disturbances of Motoneurons Exposed to Glutamate
Published in
Molecular Neurobiology, February 2018
DOI 10.1007/s12035-018-0945-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Blandine Madji Hounoum, Hélène Blasco, Emmanuelle Coque, Patrick Vourc’h, Patrick Emond, Philippe Corcia, Christian R. Andres, Cédric Raoul, Sylvie Mavel

Abstract

Glutamate-induced excitotoxicity is considered as one of the major pathophysiological factors of motoneuron death in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and other motoneuron diseases. In order to expand our knowledge on mechanisms of glutamate-induced excitotoxicity, the present study proposes to determine the metabolic consequences of glutamate and astrocytes in primary enriched motoneuron culture. Using liquid chromatography coupled to high-resolution mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS), we showed that the presence of astrocytes and glutamate profoundly modified the metabolic profile of motoneurons. Our study highlights for the first time that crosstalk between astrocytes and enriched motoneuron culture induced alterations in phenylalanine, tryptophan, purine, arginine, proline, aspartate, and glutamate metabolism in motoneurons. We observed that astrocytes modulate the sensitivity of motoneurons to glutamate, since metabolites altered by glutamate in motoneurons cultured alone were different (except 5-hydroxylysine) from those altered in co-cultured motoneurons. Our findings provide new insight into the metabolic alterations associated to astrocytes and glutamate in motoneurons and provide opportunities to identify novel therapeutic targets.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 19%
Student > Master 4 13%
Researcher 3 10%
Lecturer 2 6%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 6 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 9 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 8 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2019.
All research outputs
#15,515,912
of 25,375,376 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Neurobiology
#2,041
of 3,941 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#246,066
of 458,202 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Neurobiology
#55
of 133 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,375,376 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,941 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 458,202 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 133 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.