↓ Skip to main content

A novel clade of protistan parasites near the animal-fungal divergence.

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, October 1996
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
23 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
151 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A novel clade of protistan parasites near the animal-fungal divergence.
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, October 1996
DOI 10.1073/pnas.93.21.11907
Pubmed ID
Authors

M A Ragan, C L Goggin, R J Cawthorn, L Cerenius, A V Jamieson, S M Plourde, T G Rand, K Söderhäll, R R Gutell

Abstract

Sequences of nuclear-encoded small-subunit rRNA genes have been determined for representatives of the enigmatic genera Dermocystidium, Ichthyophonus, and Psorospermium, protistan parasites of fish and crustaceans. The small-subunit rRNA genes from these parasites and from the "rosette agent" (also a parasite of fish) together form a novel, statistically supported clade. Phylogenetic analyses demonstrate this clade to diverge near the animal-fungal dichotomy, although more precise resolution is problematic. In the most parsimonious and maximally likely phylogenetic frameworks inferred from the most stably aligned sequence regions, the clade constitutes the most basal branch of the metazoa; but within a limited range of model parameters, and in some analyses that incorporate less well-aligned sequence regions, an alternative topology in which it diverges immediately before the animal-fungal dichotomy was recovered. Mitochondrial cristae of Dermocystidium spp. are flat, whereas those of Ichthyophonus hoferi appear tubulovesiculate. These results extend our understanding of the types of organisms from which metazoa and fungi may have evolved.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 1%
Norway 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Poland 1 1%
Unknown 82 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 31 35%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 17%
Professor 10 11%
Student > Master 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 8 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 53 60%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 7%
Environmental Science 3 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 3%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 17 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2023.
All research outputs
#8,219,054
of 24,625,114 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#64,491
of 101,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,048
of 29,329 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#330
of 581 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,625,114 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 101,438 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.8. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 29,329 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 581 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.