↓ Skip to main content

Redescription of Echinostoma trivolvis (Cort, 1914) (Trematoda: Echinostomatidae) with a discussion on its identity

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Parasitology, September 1995
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
Redescription of Echinostoma trivolvis (Cort, 1914) (Trematoda: Echinostomatidae) with a discussion on its identity
Published in
Systematic Parasitology, September 1995
DOI 10.1007/bf00009468
Authors

Ivan Kanev, Bernard Fried, Vassil Dimitrov, Valentin Radev

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 4%
Czechia 1 4%
Unknown 21 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 22%
Student > Master 4 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 13%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 4 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 57%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 4%
Engineering 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2014.
All research outputs
#7,453,350
of 22,786,087 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Parasitology
#149
of 732 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,031
of 23,856 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Parasitology
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,087 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 732 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 23,856 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.