↓ Skip to main content

Structure–activity relationships of ω‐conotoxins at N‐type voltage‐sensitive calcium channels

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Molecular Recognition, May 2000
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
10 patents
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
93 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Structure–activity relationships of ω‐conotoxins at N‐type voltage‐sensitive calcium channels
Published in
Journal of Molecular Recognition, May 2000
DOI 10.1002/(sici)1099-1352(200003/04)13:2<55::aid-jmr488>3.0.co;2-o
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katherine J. Nielsen, Tina Schroeder, Richard Lewis

Abstract

Due to their selectivity towards voltage-sensitive calcium channels (VSCCs) omega-conotoxins are being exploited as a new class of therapeutics in pain management and may also have potential application in ischaemic brain injury. Here, the structure-activity relationships (SARs) of several omega-conotoxins including GVIA, MVIIA, CVID and MVIIC are explored. In addition, the three-dimensional structures of these omega-conotoxins and some structurally related peptides that form the cysteine knot are compared, and the effects of the solution environment on structure discussed. The diversity of binding and functional assays used to measure omega-conotoxin potencies at the N-type VSCC warranted a re-evaluation of the relationship between these assays. With one exception, [A22]-GVIA, this analysis revealed a linear correlation between functional (peripheral N-type VSCCs) and radioligand binding assays (central N-type VSCCs) for the omega-conotoxins and analogues that were tested over three studies. The binding and functional results of several studies are compared in an attempt to identify and distinguish those residues that are important in omega-conotoxin function as opposed to those that form part of the structural scaffold. Further to determining what omega-conotoxin residues are important for VSCC binding, the range of possible interactions between the ligand and channel are considered and the factors that influence the selectivity of MVIIA, GVIA and CVID towards N-type VSCCs examined.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
United States 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 58 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 24%
Professor 7 11%
Researcher 6 10%
Student > Master 6 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Other 14 23%
Unknown 10 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 16%
Chemistry 9 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 6%
Neuroscience 2 3%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 12 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2023.
All research outputs
#5,446,629
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Molecular Recognition
#91
of 601 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,483
of 40,219 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Molecular Recognition
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 601 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 40,219 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.