You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Less is more: the design of early‐warning scoring systems affects the speed and accuracy of scoring
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Advanced Nursing, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1111/jan.12618 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Melany J Christofidis, Andrew Hill, Mark S Horswill, Marcus O Watson |
| Abstract |
To evaluate the effect of early-warning scoring system design on the speed and accuracy of scoring. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 31% |
| Ireland | 2 | 15% |
| Unknown | 7 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 54% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 38% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 37 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 22% |
| Researcher | 6 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 22% |
| Unknown | 4 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 27% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 24% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 14% |
| Psychology | 3 | 8% |
| Engineering | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 5 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2015.
All research outputs
#4,326,076
of 24,549,201 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Advanced Nursing
#1,746
of 5,488 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,864
of 362,008 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Advanced Nursing
#24
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,549,201 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,488 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,008 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.