You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
‘That doesn't translate’: the role of evidence‐based practice in disempowering speech pathologists in acute aphasia management
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1111/1460-6984.12155 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Abby Foster, Linda Worrall, Miranda Rose, Robyn O'Halloran |
| Abstract |
An evidence-practice gap has been identified in current acute aphasia management practice, with the provision of services to people with aphasia in the acute hospital widely considered in the literature to be inconsistent with best-practice recommendations. The reasons for this evidence-practice gap are unclear; however, speech pathologists practising in this setting have articulated a sense of dissonance regarding their limited service provision to this population. A clearer understanding of why this evidence-practice gap exists is essential in order to support and promote evidence-based approaches to the care of people with aphasia in acute care settings. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 8 | 38% |
| Australia | 6 | 29% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 6 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 57% |
| Scientists | 8 | 38% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Cyprus | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 109 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 11% |
| Researcher | 9 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 26 | 23% |
| Unknown | 17 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 26 | 23% |
| Psychology | 18 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 10% |
| Linguistics | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 15 | 13% |
| Unknown | 23 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2019.
All research outputs
#2,631,156
of 24,549,201 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders
#243
of 1,075 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,413
of 361,848 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders
#2
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,549,201 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,075 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,848 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.