↓ Skip to main content

Potential surrogate markers of cerebral microvascular angiopathy in asymptomatic subjects at risk of stroke

Overview of attention for article published in European Radiology, November 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
Title
Potential surrogate markers of cerebral microvascular angiopathy in asymptomatic subjects at risk of stroke
Published in
European Radiology, November 2008
DOI 10.1007/s00330-008-1202-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Johann Selvarajah, Marietta Scott, Stavros Stivaros, Sharon Hulme, Rachel Georgiou, Nancy Rothwell, Pippa Tyrrell, Alan Jackson

Abstract

Cerebral microvascular angiopathy (MVA) is associated with clinical vascular risk factors and is characterised by histological changes, including thickening of the walls of arterial vessels and dilatation of the Virchow-Robin spaces (VRS). We have previously described two novel biomarkers of MVA based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), VRS dilatation and abnormalities in the transfer of systolic arterial pulsation to the ventricular CSF, which occur as a result of decreased cerebral arterial compliance. These are associated with vascular dementia and treatment-resistant late onset depression. We studied a group of normal subjects at risk of cerebrovascular disease to determine if these biomarkers are present in patients who have no evidence of symptomatic vascular disease. We studied 31 subjects, 16 with three or more vascular risk factors and 15 with one or less significant risk factors. We measured arterial blood flow and CSF flow in the cerebral aqueduct, white matter lesion load, and the distribution and number of VRS. There were significant differences in CSF pulsatility and in VRS in the basal ganglia between the two groups, but no differences in white matter lesion load. We conclude that asymptomatic subjects at risk of stroke have MRI evidence of MVA before white matter lesions become apparent.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 62 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 17%
Student > Master 11 17%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 5%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 7 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 38%
Engineering 5 8%
Neuroscience 5 8%
Computer Science 4 6%
Psychology 4 6%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 12 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2019.
All research outputs
#7,453,350
of 22,786,087 outputs
Outputs from European Radiology
#1,123
of 4,113 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,595
of 92,896 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Radiology
#5
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,087 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,113 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 92,896 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.