↓ Skip to main content

Hypophosphatasia: molecular testing of 19 prenatal cases and discussion about genetic counseling

Overview of attention for article published in Prenatal Diagnosis, October 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hypophosphatasia: molecular testing of 19 prenatal cases and discussion about genetic counseling
Published in
Prenatal Diagnosis, October 2008
DOI 10.1002/pd.2088
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brigitte Simon‐Bouy, Agnès Taillandier, Delphine Fauvert, Isabelle Brun‐Heath, Jean‐Louis Serre, Carmen G. Armengod, Martin G. Bialer, Michèle Mathieu, Jacques Cousin, David Chitayat, Jan Liebelt, Barbara Feldman, Marion Gérard‐Blanluet, Stefani Körtge‐Jung, Cath King, Hannele Laivuori, Martine Le Merrer, Sarju Mehta, Christina Jern, Saba Sharif, Fabienne Prieur, Gabriele Gillessen‐Kaesbach, Andreas Zankl, Etienne Mornet

Abstract

We studied hypophosphatasia (HP) mutations in 19 cases prenatally detected by ultrasonography without familial history of HP. We correlated the mutations with the reported ultrasound signs, and discussed genetic counseling with regard to the particular dominantly inherited prenatal benign form of HP. The coding sequence of the tissue nonspecific alkaline phosphatase (TNSALP) gene was analyzed by DNA sequencing, and 3D modeling was used to locate the mutated amino acids with regard to the functional domains of TNSALP. Although reported ultrasound signs were heterogeneous, two mutated alleles were found in 18 of the 19 cases studied, indicating recessive transmission of the disease. Functional domains of TNSALP were affected by 74% of missense mutations. In all the cases, including one with only a heterozygous mutation, molecular, biological, and familial data do not corroborate the hypothesis of prenatal benign HP. The mutation c.1133A>T observed in the prenatal benign form of HP and common in USA was not found in this series. The results point out the prenatally detectable allelic heterogeneity of HP. The nature of the detected mutations and the evidence of recessive inheritance do not support these cases being affected with prenatal benign HP.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 5 26%
Researcher 4 21%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 11%
Student > Postgraduate 2 11%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 3 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 58%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 16%
Unspecified 1 5%
Unknown 4 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2019.
All research outputs
#8,292,507
of 24,811,707 outputs
Outputs from Prenatal Diagnosis
#769
of 2,306 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,013
of 97,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Prenatal Diagnosis
#5
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,811,707 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,306 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,442 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.