| Title |
First international consensus conference on standardization of oncoplastic breast conserving surgery
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, June 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10549-017-4314-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Walter P. Weber, Savas D. Soysal, Mahmoud El-Tamer, Virgilio Sacchini, Michael Knauer, Christoph Tausch, Nik Hauser, Andreas Günthert, Yves Harder, Elisabeth A. Kappos, Fabienne Schwab, Florian Fitzal, Peter Dubsky, Vesna Bjelic-Radisic, Roland Reitsamer, Rupert Koller, Jörg Heil, Markus Hahn, Jens-Uwe Blohmer, Jürgen Hoffmann, Christine Solbach, Christoph Heitmann, Bernd Gerber, Martin Haug, Christian Kurzeder |
| Abstract |
To obtain consensus recommendations for the standardization of oncoplastic breast conserving surgery (OPS) from an international panel of experts in breast surgery including delegates from the German, Austrian and Swiss societies of senology. A total of 52 questions were addressed by electronic voting. The panel's recommendations were put into context with current evidence and the report was circled in an iterative open email process until consensus was obtained. The panelists considered OPS safe and effective for improving aesthetic outcomes and broadening the indication for breast conserving surgery (BCS) towards larger tumors. A slim majority believed that OPS reduces the rate of positive margins; however, there was consensus that OPS is associated with an increased risk of complications compared to conventional BCS. The panel strongly endorsed patient-reported outcomes measurement, and recommended selected scales of the Breast-Q™-Breast Conserving Therapy Module for that purpose. The Clough bi-level classification was recommended for standard use in clinical practice for indicating, planning and performing OPS, and the Hoffmann classification for surgical reports and billing purposes. Mastopexy and reduction mammoplasty were the only two recognized OPS procedure categories supported by a majority of the panel. Finally, the experts unanimously supported the statement that every OPS procedure should be tailored to each individual patient. When implemented into clinical practice, the panel recommendations may improve safety and effectiveness of OPS. The attendees agreed that there is a need for prospective multicenter studies to optimize patient selection and for standardized criteria to qualify and accredit OPS training centers. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 85 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 11% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 25 | 29% |
| Unknown | 16 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 46 | 54% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 8% |
| Engineering | 3 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Unknown | 16 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2018.
All research outputs
#18,587,406
of 23,023,224 outputs
Outputs from Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
#3,744
of 4,683 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#242,203
of 317,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
#69
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,023,224 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,683 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,534 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.