| Title |
Persistent Pulmonary Hypertension and Histologic Chorioamnionitis in Preterm Infants: Controlled Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Pediatric Cardiology, February 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00246-018-1809-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
N. Katz, Y. Bar-Or, A. Raucher-Sterrnfeld, A. Tamir, D. Kohelet |
| Abstract |
Persistent pulmonary hypertension (PPHN) of the newborn is one of the most challenging acute disorders of postnatal transition with substantial morbidity and mortality. The aim of the study was to find if there is an association between persistent pulmonary hypertension and histologic chorioamnionitis in preterm infants. 27 preterm infants with echocardiographic evidence of PPHN within the first 3 days of life were eligible for the study. A matched control group of 27 patients was chosen according to gestational age, date of birth, and gender. Data collection included the need for respiratory support, use of nitric oxide oxygen supplementation, duration of rupture of membranes, blood culture, blood count, and C-reactive protein levels at birth and 12 h. Maternal clinical and laboratory data suggesting clinical chorioamnionitis Placentas of both groups were examined. Differences between groups were analyzed using two-tail t test, Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, Chi-square test. No statistically differences were found in all parameters compared between groups, except for a higher number of patients in the PPHN group who were treated by oxygen supplementation. An association was not found between the incidence of HCA and echocardiographic PPHN in preterm infants in the first 3 days of life. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 15% |
| Researcher | 3 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 10% |
| Professor | 1 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 9 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 35% |
| Energy | 1 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 11 | 55% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2018.
All research outputs
#20,465,050
of 23,023,224 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Cardiology
#1,103
of 1,414 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#297,959
of 336,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Cardiology
#31
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,023,224 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,414 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,877 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.