↓ Skip to main content

The expanded evolutionary synthesis—a response to Godfrey-Smith, Haig, and West-Eberhard

Overview of attention for article published in Biology & Philosophy, March 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
Title
The expanded evolutionary synthesis—a response to Godfrey-Smith, Haig, and West-Eberhard
Published in
Biology & Philosophy, March 2007
DOI 10.1007/s10539-007-9064-z
Authors

Eva Jablonka, Marion J. Lamb

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 5%
Germany 2 2%
Portugal 2 2%
Spain 2 2%
Brazil 1 1%
Argentina 1 1%
Czechia 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Poland 1 1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 77 83%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 22%
Researcher 16 17%
Professor 16 17%
Student > Bachelor 9 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 8%
Other 17 18%
Unknown 8 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 45 48%
Philosophy 12 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 12%
Psychology 5 5%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 8 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2020.
All research outputs
#6,413,376
of 22,786,087 outputs
Outputs from Biology & Philosophy
#275
of 663 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,224
of 76,831 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biology & Philosophy
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,087 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 663 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,831 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.