↓ Skip to main content

Inhibition of thigmostimulated cell differentiation with RGD-peptides inUromyces germlings

Overview of attention for article published in Protoplasma, March 1996
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
Title
Inhibition of thigmostimulated cell differentiation with RGD-peptides inUromyces germlings
Published in
Protoplasma, March 1996
DOI 10.1007/bf01273171
Authors

A. Corrêa, R. C. Staples, H. C. Hoch

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 36%
Professor 3 21%
Student > Bachelor 2 14%
Student > Master 1 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 43%
Environmental Science 2 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 7%
Physics and Astronomy 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 2 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2012.
All research outputs
#7,453,350
of 22,786,087 outputs
Outputs from Protoplasma
#133
of 970 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,198
of 26,782 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Protoplasma
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,087 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 970 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 26,782 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.