↓ Skip to main content

Are Optimal CO2 Emissions Really Optimal?

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental and Resource Economics, April 1998
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Are Optimal CO2 Emissions Really Optimal?
Published in
Environmental and Resource Economics, April 1998
DOI 10.1023/a:1008235326513
Authors

Christian Azar

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Unknown 33 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 18%
Other 2 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 3%
Student > Bachelor 1 3%
Student > Postgraduate 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 23 68%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 4 12%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 12%
Engineering 2 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 3%
Unknown 23 68%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2023.
All research outputs
#8,533,995
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Environmental and Resource Economics
#607
of 1,061 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,369
of 32,426 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental and Resource Economics
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,061 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 32,426 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.