↓ Skip to main content

Hot, it’s not: Reflections on Cool It, by Bjorn Lomborg

Overview of attention for article published in Climatic Change, April 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
Hot, it’s not: Reflections on Cool It, by Bjorn Lomborg
Published in
Climatic Change, April 2008
DOI 10.1007/s10584-008-9403-3
Authors

Frank Ackerman

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 4%
Portugal 1 4%
South Africa 1 4%
Brazil 1 4%
Unknown 19 83%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 26%
Student > Master 4 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 13%
Other 2 9%
Other 2 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 9 39%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 9%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 9%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 1 4%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2022.
All research outputs
#7,671,701
of 23,347,114 outputs
Outputs from Climatic Change
#5,101
of 5,838 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,813
of 82,548 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climatic Change
#27
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,347,114 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,838 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,548 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.