↓ Skip to main content

Pair-bond formation and breeding-site limitation in the convict cichlid, Archocentrus nigrofasciatus

Overview of attention for article published in acta ethologica, February 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
citeulike
6 CiteULike
Title
Pair-bond formation and breeding-site limitation in the convict cichlid, Archocentrus nigrofasciatus
Published in
acta ethologica, February 2007
DOI 10.1007/s10211-007-0028-8
Authors

Jennifer M. Gumm, Murray Itzkowitz

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 3%
Austria 1 3%
Unknown 34 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 19%
Researcher 7 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 19%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Professor 3 8%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 5 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 78%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Energy 1 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 3%
Unknown 5 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2020.
All research outputs
#8,064,660
of 24,214,995 outputs
Outputs from acta ethologica
#80
of 226 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,560
of 78,736 outputs
Outputs of similar age from acta ethologica
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,214,995 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 226 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 78,736 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.