↓ Skip to main content

Mate choice in female convict cichlids (Amatitlania nigrofasciata) and the relationship between male size and dominance

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Ethology, August 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
citeulike
8 CiteULike
Title
Mate choice in female convict cichlids (Amatitlania nigrofasciata) and the relationship between male size and dominance
Published in
Journal of Ethology, August 2008
DOI 10.1007/s10164-008-0111-2
Authors

Jennifer Gagliardi-Seeley, Joseph Leese, Nick Santangelo, M. Itzkowitz

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Unknown 38 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 26%
Student > Master 8 21%
Researcher 6 15%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 8%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 4 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 77%
Environmental Science 2 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Unknown 6 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2020.
All research outputs
#7,453,350
of 22,786,087 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ethology
#180
of 500 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,071
of 83,594 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ethology
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,087 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 500 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 83,594 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.