↓ Skip to main content

Comparative evaluation of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of insulin glargine (Glaritus®) and Lantus® in healthy subjects: a double-blind, randomized clamp study

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Diabetologica, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
Title
Comparative evaluation of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of insulin glargine (Glaritus®) and Lantus® in healthy subjects: a double-blind, randomized clamp study
Published in
Acta Diabetologica, February 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00592-018-1113-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ashima Bhatia, Shraddha Tawade, Mushtaque Mastim, Eliford Ngaimisi Kitabi, Mathangi Gopalakrishnan, Manish Shah, Sridhar Yeshamaina, Joga Gobburu, Maharaj Sahib, Dipak Thakur, K. M. Prasanna Kumar

Abstract

The objective of the study was to compare the pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) properties of an insulin glargine formulation, Glaritus®(test) with the innovator's formulation Lantus®(reference) using the euglycemic clamp technique in a single-dose, double-blind, randomized, two sequences, four-period replicate crossover study in healthy volunteers (n = 40). Subjects received subcutaneous administration of the insulin glargine (0.4 IU/kg) formulation at two occasions for test and reference and a 20% glucose solution was infused at variable rate to maintain euglycemia for 24 h. Both PK [area under the plasma concentration time curve (AUC0-24 h) and maximum insulin concentration (Cmax)] and PD endpoints [area under glucose infusion rate time curve (AUCGIR0-24) and maximum glucose infusion rate (GIRmax)] demonstrated bioequivalence of Glaritus to Lantus with the 90% confidence interval of geometric mean ratio of test to reference entirely contained within 0.80-1.25. Both formulations showed equivalent geometric least-square mean LSM value (0.08 nmol/L) for Cmax. The geometric LSM AUC0-24 hvalue for Glaritus®(1.09 h nmol/L) was comparable to Lantus (1.05 h nmol/L). Median Tmaxvalues were also identical (12 h for both), and median t1/2 values were also equal (18 h for both). For GIRTmax, the difference between the means for the two was not statistically significant. No AEs related to study formulations were reported, and both products were well tolerated. The test product (Glaritus) was found to be bioequivalent to the reference product (Lantus). CTRI/2015/06/005890; http://www.ctri.nic.in/ .

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 19%
Student > Bachelor 5 16%
Student > Master 4 13%
Other 2 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 6 19%
Unknown 7 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 6 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 16%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 9%
Neuroscience 3 9%
Computer Science 2 6%
Other 7 22%
Unknown 6 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2018.
All research outputs
#15,441,938
of 23,023,224 outputs
Outputs from Acta Diabetologica
#546
of 929 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#215,233
of 336,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Diabetologica
#13
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,023,224 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 929 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,877 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.