↓ Skip to main content

Site conditions and nutrient status ofCordeauxia edulis (Caesalpiniaceae) in its natural habitat in Central Somalia

Overview of attention for article published in Economic Botany, April 1988
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Site conditions and nutrient status ofCordeauxia edulis (Caesalpiniaceae) in its natural habitat in Central Somalia
Published in
Economic Botany, April 1988
DOI 10.1007/bf02858926
Authors

Pay Drechsel, Wolfgang Zech

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 20%
Lecturer 1 20%
Other 1 20%
Student > Master 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 40%
Environmental Science 1 20%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 December 2013.
All research outputs
#7,453,350
of 22,786,087 outputs
Outputs from Economic Botany
#272
of 844 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,691
of 13,185 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Economic Botany
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,087 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 844 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 13,185 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.