Title |
U-Pb zircon age for the Daohugou Biota at Ningcheng of Inner Mongolia and comments on related issues
|
---|---|
Published in |
Science Bulletin, November 2006
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11434-006-2165-2 |
Authors |
Yongqing Liu, Yanxue Liu, Shu’an Ji, Zhiqing Yang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Chile | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 32 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 7 | 21% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 15% |
Student > Master | 4 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 9% |
Other | 5 | 15% |
Unknown | 6 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 13 | 39% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 33% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 3% |
Chemistry | 1 | 3% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 6 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2022.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Science Bulletin
#698
of 1,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,085
of 90,069 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science Bulletin
#5
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,744 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 90,069 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.