↓ Skip to main content

The Biological Contributions to Gender Identity and Gender Diversity: Bringing Data to the Table

Overview of attention for article published in Behavior Genetics, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#4 of 975)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
496 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
video
3 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
100 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
364 Mendeley
Title
The Biological Contributions to Gender Identity and Gender Diversity: Bringing Data to the Table
Published in
Behavior Genetics, February 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10519-018-9889-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tinca J. C. Polderman, Baudewijntje P. C. Kreukels, Michael S. Irwig, Lauren Beach, Yee-Ming Chan, Eske M. Derks, Isabel Esteva, Jesse Ehrenfeld, Martin Den Heijer, Danielle Posthuma, Lewis Raynor, Amy Tishelman, Lea K. Davis, on behalf of the International Gender Diversity Genomics Consortium

Abstract

The American Psychological Association defines gender identity as, "A person's deeply-felt, inherent sense of being a boy, a man, or a male; a girl, a woman, or a female; or an alternative gender (e.g., genderqueer, gender nonconforming, gender neutral) that may or may not correspond to a person's sex assigned at birth or to a person's primary or secondary sex characteristics" (American Psychological Association, Am Psychol 70(9):832-864, 2015). Here we review the evidence that gender identity and related socially defined gender constructs are influenced in part by innate factors including genes. Based on the data reviewed, we hypothesize that gender identity is a multifactorial complex trait with a heritable polygenic component. We argue that increasing the awareness of the biological diversity underlying gender identity development is relevant to all domains of social, medical, and neuroscience research and foundational for reducing health disparities and promoting human-rights protections for gender minorities.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 496 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 364 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 364 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 61 17%
Student > Master 42 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 8%
Researcher 24 7%
Student > Postgraduate 21 6%
Other 63 17%
Unknown 125 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 59 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 50 14%
Social Sciences 29 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 5%
Other 53 15%
Unknown 135 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 421. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2024.
All research outputs
#70,136
of 25,782,229 outputs
Outputs from Behavior Genetics
#4
of 975 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,705
of 345,374 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavior Genetics
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,782,229 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 975 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,374 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them