↓ Skip to main content

The complete mitochondrial genome structure of snow leopard Panthera uncia

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Biology Reports, April 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
171 Mendeley
Title
The complete mitochondrial genome structure of snow leopard Panthera uncia
Published in
Molecular Biology Reports, April 2008
DOI 10.1007/s11033-008-9257-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lei Wei, Xiaobing Wu, Zhigang Jiang

Abstract

The complete mitochondrial genome (mtDNA) of snow leopard Panthera uncia was obtained by using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique based on the PCR fragments of 30 primers we designed. The entire mtDNA sequence was 16 773 base pairs (bp) in length, and the base composition was: A-5,357 bp (31.9%); C-4,444 bp (26.5%); G-2,428 bp (14.5%); T-4,544 bp (27.1%). The structural characteristics [0] of the P. uncia mitochondrial genome were highly similar to these of Felis catus, Acinonyx jubatus, Neofelis nebulosa and other mammals. However, we found several distinctive features of the mitochondrial genome of Panthera unica. First, the termination codon of COIII was TAA, which differed from those of F. catus, A. jubatus and N. nebulosa. Second, tRNA(Ser) ((AGY)), which lacked the ''DHU'' arm, could not be folded into the typical cloverleaf-shaped structure. Third, in the control region, a long repetitive sequence in RS-2 (32 bp) region was found with 2 repeats while one short repetitive segment (9 bp) was found with 15 repeats in the RS-3 region. We performed phylogenetic analysis based on a 3 816 bp concatenated sequence of 12S rRNA, 16S rRNA, ND2, ND4, ND5, Cyt b and ATP8 for P. uncia and other related species, the result indicated that P. uncia and P. leo were the sister species, which was different from the previous findings.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 171 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 4 2%
India 3 2%
United Kingdom 2 1%
United Arab Emirates 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Other 4 2%
Unknown 152 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 42 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 22%
Student > Master 31 18%
Student > Bachelor 15 9%
Other 11 6%
Other 26 15%
Unknown 9 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 103 60%
Environmental Science 35 20%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 4%
Computer Science 3 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 1%
Other 7 4%
Unknown 14 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2014.
All research outputs
#7,453,350
of 22,786,087 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Biology Reports
#388
of 2,905 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,267
of 81,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Biology Reports
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,087 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,905 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,024 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them