↓ Skip to main content

The fractal growth of fatigue defects in materials

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Fracture, May 2000
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#32 of 199)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
The fractal growth of fatigue defects in materials
Published in
International Journal of Fracture, May 2000
DOI 10.1023/a:1007635717332
Authors

M. Rybaczuk, P. Stoppel

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 30%
Researcher 2 20%
Student > Postgraduate 1 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 10%
Unknown 3 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 5 50%
Materials Science 2 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 10%
Unknown 2 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2018.
All research outputs
#8,533,995
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Fracture
#32
of 199 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,797
of 40,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Fracture
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 199 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 40,855 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them