Title |
Development of an antigen-capture ELISA for the quantitation of equine arteritis virus in culture supernatant
|
---|---|
Published in |
Archives of Virology, February 2018
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00705-018-3746-5 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ting Qi, Yue Hu, Zhe Hu, Shihua Zhao, Ann Cullinane, Pamela Lyons, Sarah Gildea, Xiaojun Wang |
Abstract |
Quantitation of virions is one of the important indexes in virological studies. To establish a sensitive and rapid quantitative detection method for equine arteritis virus (EAV), an antigen-capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (AC-ELISA) was developed by using two EAV nucleoprotein monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), 2B9 and 2B3, prepared in this study. After condition optimization, mAb 2B9 was used as the capture antibody, and HRP-labeled 2B3 was chosen as the detecting antibody. The AC-ELISA had a good standard curve when viral particles of the Bucyrus EAV strain were used as a reference standard. The detection limit for the Bucyrus EAV strain was 36 PFU, and the method had a good linear relationship between 72-2297 PFU. The AC-ELISA could specifically detect the Bucyrus EAV strain and had no cross-reaction with other equine viruses. The sensitivity of the AC-ELISA was much higher than that of a western blotting assay but lower than that of a real-time PCR method. However, as a quantitative antigen detection method, the sensitivity of the AC-ELISA was approximately 300 times than the western blotting assay. Furthermore, the AC-ELISA assay could be successfully used in quantification of viral content in an in vitro infection assay, such as a one-step growth curve of EAV, as well as in a transfection assay, such as virus rescue from an infectious cDNA clone of EAV. These results show that the AC-ELISA established in this study is a good alternative for antigen detection of EAV, being a simple, convenient and quantitative detection method for EAV antigens. |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 7 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 2 | 29% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 14% |
Unspecified | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 1 | 14% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 14% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 14% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 3 | 43% |